RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Thanks but no thanksbang on, neofinetia. Another possible logical explanation to this Agreement (which itself defies logic) is that it was never constructed with the intention of surviving a vote. Why would FCU spend money, at $80-100K per hole, to widen the value gap between FCU and DML? I can't buy the Dev ego/CEO idea. Compared to a potential triple or better on selling FCU, if Dev has ca 8million shares, he becomes a wealthy man within a year or so. He'll have plenty of loot, even after-tax, to wheel and deal to his heart's content. I have an ego too, but I'd take the money every time. This is just wondering out loud, but if he and the rest of FCU management really wanted this to succeed they might have insisted on better terms. They probably had some inkling of the PEA report, and certainly aren't wasting any drill holes on Forrest Lake so far this summer. It's served the purpose of keeping the carrion birds away over the summer. Ross' drilling has been amazing again, the market MAY be waking from a long cold sleep, and they're hanging out in swinging London with all the potential suitors. Maybe they want this to fail as badly as we FCU longs. DML's management may genuinely have felt that this was a sincere gesture from FCU when it was anything but. Maybe I'm just sleep-deprived. Still voting No to the terms we have in front of us. Try again, DML. Or do some drilling of your own, or sell more iffy claims for primo prices, or something BIG to justify this deal. Or announce an amendment to the terms. Quick. Many of us will vote as soon as we get the forms.