Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Comment by akm3736on Sep 09, 2015 4:00pm
76 Views
Post# 24090292

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dennis Gartman on CNBC: The Worst is Behind Us

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dennis Gartman on CNBC: The Worst is Behind Us
Oli, I am in the same position, got in about 2 years ago and averaged down based on management statements. The only way this (governance) willo change is a shareholder revolt to get the Chairman out and have an independent be elected the Chairman. If, per Perdi, insiders make up 11%, it leaves an excellent opportunity for the 89% to kick them out. I should also point out that they have given themselves 5-7 years when options expire. That is a long time to cash in when options are handed out at low prices. Normally options have a 3 year expiry. Because of the long exercise period, the share based compensation that gets amortized is much higher, hence the big losses after EBITDA. In the long run, it works out provided the options remain unexercised. With a long expiry, if the options are exercised, it dilutes the stock, affecting CF and NI per share negatively, which leaves the SP lower over the long term. I have noted and mentioned before that management grants themselves options at cheaper price when their higher priced expire. This is theft. Options are granted for performance in the future i.e. they cash in if they perform within 3-5 years, which is fine. Why they grant themselves so many options in the past 18 months is mind boggling and should ne investigated. Also note that they are compensated for the short term according to the AIF and there is nothing to gauge them for long term sustainability. I hope this helps, that is why I was questioning your oil price increase timing. If you are holding for 10 years, there is nothing to indicate there will be a change in management's attitude except acting as parasites on the back of shareholders. The alternative is to have someone take over but the Board and management will reject before being brought to shareholders. Of course, a hostile takeover may work. I say all this in simple English but will be too complicated for Perdi to understand as he picks snippets and does not understand how one thing has an impact in the bigger scheme of things, a domino effect. I wish you luck. I am contemplating cashing in for a loss at a time when technical warrant. I would rather recover some cash and reinvest in something else, maybe TGZ, same situation as PTA with cash, no debt and a very low cost producer and extremely disciplined and ethical management with low compensation. The only difference; TGZ produces GOLD, not OIL. GLTA
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse