RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Insiders Ownership is About 11%, pro forma the PNA DealGladyou finally pointed this out, watching the uninformed options blather was painful.
The he insiders paid little for their stock the way thing thing was set up. Same with petronova and suroco. Lots of the early guys did vend in for free or penny stock deals although now it's hard to follow as some of that was nearly a decade ago in the predecessors.
Suffice to say, it's not like management/insiders bought shares at market prices last year.
akm3736 wrote:
Perdi, you are dumb! Check your post; it says insiders HOLD 11%. That does not mean options that they hold. Quick lesson, insiders holdings at 11% are the actual shares. Now, a very simple question.... how many of these holdings were given to them 'free" to fatten their paycheques as RSUs and incentives? See the MIC. As Shrinkler mentions, you deflect challenges; do you have a Teflon coating? Just answer the question... how many of those insider holdings (excl PNA) were given as incentive. Next, think about incentives for what? for the SP to depreciate by 80% in a year or so? I am not wasting my time on your dumbness.