RE:Does PoC have a good side?Prince,
Regarding the BoM potential shorter timeline, this was based upon information put into the public record regarding the a) MACE event rates in the diabetic/low HDL population in the ASSURE/SUSTAIN analysis; b) the BETonMACE design of targeting to reach 250 MACE events; and c) the projected # of patients.
Anyone who has read my posts in their entirety knows that I am very critical of the information I use and when something is uncertain I will indicate that. For the above potential BETonMACE timeline, I always qualified my statements by indicating that none of us will know any trial details for certain until the trial is launched and the BETonMACE protocol is available to view.
Forecasting a potential outcome based on available information at the time, while at the same time providing clear caveats, is not pumping in my book. That is critical analysis. You should try it sometime. And even now, we still don't have a clear picture of the real potential timelines because the trial hasn't started and the full protocol isn't released. So how can you be right? Get over yourself prince.
BDAZ
PoC wrote: ..you were pumping BoM done in 6 months and i called you on it...i was right and you was wrong and BTW i provided likely reasons why you were wrong (ps seems in part IMO 30% is now due to tighter MACE measures)"
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.rvx/resverlogix-corp#63LpoJ3pxtjGm6yb.99