RE:RE:Does PoC have a good side?
bearskinned, yoiur post is in fact not factual correct, as best i remember RVX has always been touting 2 years from start to end (dosing end), you chose to focus on MACE based on that post hoc analysis which i have always questioned the 77% RRR (i believe the 208 ARR but not the lipitor/crestor rate as being way too high (and ps i wonder if using only the stringest 3 criteria it is still the sam ARR))...and it is pumping when you come up with 6 months which is only 25 % of the two+ years RVX maintains or you pumped a 75% RRR R(relative runtime rate reduction) vs. RVX timeline (ROTLFMAO this is how hoity toity plays with stats)..and finally to help you get over yourself the trial will actually take as long as it takes so in finality no one will be right except largely by chance...and FYI the shareprice implication (which is why i invest) is hugely different 6 months vs. 2 years+ and i find it hard to believe you don't know that and the basis of "pump" relates to shareprice