Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by teeveeon Sep 21, 2015 7:45pm
208 Views
Post# 24123594

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dissent Rights

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dissent RightsThe record date is September 04th, so one more tactic, especially if you believe the share price and market capitalization will suffer further if the YES vote prevails, is to sell your shares now and vote NO. If the YES side prevails, you will likely be able to buy back lower, and if the NO side prevails, you can buy also back after guaging market response. I believe there is likely to be some further downside either way, but more downside if the YES side prevails.  

losecash wrote:
Teevee that is exactly what I surmised. Also seems like a logical course of action. Fair value I would like to know what the spectrum might be for that. If a large group decided to choose that route hiring a securities lawyer to argue fair value would not cost much. Further to that I bet getting fair value if the yes vote won that a person if they chose could buy back the new Denison after the rollback for alot cheaper. I believe the consolidation will pound the market cap down another leg.

Bullboard Posts