RE:Recent Alice Related DecisionsI don`t think the Alice decision is relevant to our situation but what it does do is open up an appeal to the CAFC with the faint hope that the changing landscape of patentability gives Citrix another delay in making a court ordered payment.
To rehash the old dispute of the value and purpose of the patent; The Creighton reference solved the problem of dynamic IP but did not document their solution, probably assuming obviousness. That was why judge Aldrich called it a close case. 01 solved the same dynamic IP problem but also had the good sense to document their solution. After all these years I can`t see PTAB or the CAFC reversing their decision on the patentability of the `479.