GREY:CRIUF - Post by User
Comment by
dryhumperon Oct 02, 2015 8:47am
59 Views
Post# 24156254
RE:RE:RE:RE:BBB
RE:RE:RE:RE:BBBLet it go Billy, you will be alright!
BannedBillyBoy wrote: dryhumper wrote: Seriously Billy, let it go. I am not your little bum buddy primed24.
"Humper too often thinks simplistically and that he/she is the smartest person in the room. And often writes misinformation, which I always take issue with. No matter who writes it. People unfortunately all too often place reliance on what is written on these boards. "
Are you really still crying about me calling the offering and IPO. Opps my bad. WHO CARES! RBC lists all offerings under the IPO tab and so by default I called it an IPO. I can mail you a box of tissues if you need them
I ain't the smartest person in the room, and I keep that in mind every time I write something. And when I'm wrong, I'll fall on my sword and admit it. And move on.
You have been wrong many times and you have never "fallen on your sword". You corrected me when I incorrectly called the US Holding Co. the parent company but you never admitted you were wrong for calling the holding company the operating company. Time to move on Billy. Your hate will consume you. The funny thing - you are hating the wrong guy LOL. I hope that Primed24 follows your posts. He probably rolls around the floor laughing at your contstant attacks on strangers!
BannedBillyBoy wrote: charmed3timer wrote:
Billy, my initial comment wasn't really directed at you, and I know you don't like me, and that's fine,
but
would you at least back me when I say
"Analyst's already know how to read financial statements"
?
PS. Hey guys If you think KWH balance sheet is tricky then have you a lookie at STB, with all the Deprec. Ammort. leasing, fuel costs, etc, etc
Given your post just before this one, despite being insulted by it, we agree on analysts. If an analyst is covering a company, they has better be knowledgeable about the industry accounting standards, policies and practises, and further the reasons underlying such standards, policies and practises. And I'm talking about CFA's who have passed rigorous exams, and then afterward have chosen to gain additional expertise in specific industries, such as, say, trusts for example.
Humper too often thinks simplistically and that he/she is the smartest person in the room. And often writes misinformation, which I always take issue with. No matter who writes it. People unfortunately all too often place reliance on what is written on these boards.
I ain't the smartest person in the room, and I keep that in mind every time I write something. And when I'm wrong, I'll fall on my sword and admit it. And move on.
A company like Crius is a good reason to have a broker, so the layman investor can have access to expertise that can explain exactly what it is you want to invest in. Because most who do have no idea what is behind a number in a financial statement. Well, except maybe "Cash".
No you're not. You are what I wrote you are.