RE:RE:RE:what you guys think of that from last night?wintersun10, I prefer the 280 million all stock deal, if there is any truth to this scenario. I'm against the 2 for 1 split of shares. If this 280 million deal goes through, it reminds me of the International/Denison deal around 2003ish. I hope the Fission deal does not go through as it stands, despite a terrible resource market. The 280 million deal - I would vote YES. There is no White Knight waiting in the wings for FCU............. Globe/CP say Lundin touting Denison's move on Fission 2015-10-07 09:40 ET - In the News Also In the News (C-CCO) Cameco Corp Also In the News (C-FCU) Fission Uranium Corp The Financial Post reports in its Wednesday, Oct. 7, edition that stock promoter Lukas Lundin has joined an effort to convince Fission Uranium's skeptical retail shareholders that they should approve a friendly merger with Denison Mines. The Post's Peter Koven writes that the shareholder vote is slated for Oct. 14. Executives at both companies concede they do not know which way Fission's investors will go. The vast majority of the stock is held by retail shareholders, some of whom are loudly resisting the deal with Denison, one of Mr. Lundin's companies. As a result, Mr. Lundin is speaking with retail investors in Toronto this week to make the case for the $280-million, all-stock deal. For him, the argument is simple. "We're trying to become the go-to name in the industry. When uranium moves up again, we should move quite strongly because there's nowhere else (for investors) to go. You have Cameco and Denison." Fission chief executive officer Dev Randhawa appreciates that retail investors would prefer a monster takeover offer from Cameco or Areva to this smaller deal with Denison. However, he thinks shareholders are ignoring the glaring fact that there is no such deal out there. 2015 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved. Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.dml/denison-mines-inc#1pUqiJe9x6pxZ0dc.99