Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by teeveeon Oct 09, 2015 11:56am
139 Views
Post# 24179432

RE:Superior offer!

RE:Superior offer!All any shareholder need do is look at Dev's track record at Strathmore. He turned down selling Strathmore at the height of the uranium market, and got lucky selling the US assets years later at fraction of the previous offer and at the bottom of the market, and spinning out the Canadian properties. So what is Dev doing now? He has admitted to effectively trying to sell FCU at the bottom of the market, and when there were no offers, jumped into the arms of Lucas Lundin. How can anyone see this as good management and stewardship of assets?  

Solver wrote: Who is to say that there wasn't a superior offer? (Best discovery in 40 years)

Does anyone know for sure?

If there was an offer and there was no million dollar signing bonus, 
is it conceivable that it would have been turned down.....flat!?

If the offer came with the termination of management,  can you
guess at that end result?

Which scenario seems the most likely;  turn down a fair offer,
and throw the investors under the bus?  Or go for the million dollar+ siging bonus?

Anybody that thinks that everything is openly visible on the table in this deal and that investors know the entire truth, would easily qualify as the "gullible village idiot"!

The fact is: we know for sure that our near 500 million market cap was suddenly unexplicably reduce by 1/2 in an untimely manner for an unexplained reason.  See meeting.

Our multi, multi billion dollar valued PLS is being given away for a pittance.

So, PLS management/Lundin, show FCU investors that you still have some sense of decency, honor and fair play........ human values, and offer us the real value for PLS of at least $3.50/share cash plus some of Lundins useless shares. (They are bound to go up, should the unthinkable happens). CASH UP FRONT!!

If you can't....you show your true greedy colors!   You choose!

Quit sending your mindless "YES" flunkies to our board in false information efforts to subtlly get your way....it's not working.  

No is no and management MUST Go.  If it is true that there is no offer on the table, then it speaks also that no one may want to do business with present management!

If there is no superior offer, then that is testimony to the failure of the persons in positions to do something about it!

Vote yes if your running for a position of "gullible village idiot"........no if you want a decent and fair return on your investment!











Bullboard Posts