Timing of article is suspect to say the leastJust noticed the very noticeable death cross (50 DMA crossing 200 DMA) right at the time of the article's release (10:00 am Oct 9). Followed by extreme volume.
Seems highly suspicious that the two are a coincidence. Highly, highly suspicious.. This was the first time since the new business model that there was a technical deathcross, and, the author literally could not have timed this any better (or worse) to achieve maximum selling pressure to the stock.
Perhaps the intention was to 'pass off' the selling by the fact there was a death cross, but the author underestimated the impact of his report.
Anywho, I've been out for a little while, but this situation truly reeks of ethical breaches on both ends..