Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s): FCUUF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.

TSX:FCU - Post by User

Fission Uranium Corp

Bullboard Posts

Comment by sudzie191on Oct 26, 2015 10:22am

196 Views

Post# 24226541

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Best U3O8 Drill Holes Ever Reported...

Well teevee my dear fellow after lookiing at the drill results, and seeing the high estimates I decided to review the methodology of about 4 different posters, you included.

There is a disconnect between the overly high estimates and the drilling results, and guess what, you can likely believe the assasys for the drilling. Therefore, folks must be over zealous to varrying degrees in how they interpret them. That make any sense coming from a nucelar systems engineer, who dealt with complex technologies about a 1000 times more difficult than interpreting the spatial data of a simple 3 dimensional ore body.

It has length, depth, width, and a grade, 4 fundamental variables, but each of which are also variable.

Imagine a nuclear systems engineer figuring that out, lol

Big question for you teevee

If you don't like this deposit or the company, why do you post here?

Or since you can't do proper estimates of NXE, maybe you also don't know why you post here. Maybe its just too difficult for you to figure out why you post here, lol

All too funny really.

Noone has posted yet over on NXE chat, so maybe you are just lonesome for someone to chat with, lol

teevee wrote: sudzie,
If you actually took the time to review my methodology, you would know that I use true widths....but then again, it is clear that you couldn't review my methodology, which I have posted numerous times, because you have absolutely zero understanding of how resource calculations are performed. As I stated, the fullness of time will reveal the truth to you. In the mean time, put down the sudz and sober up.

sudzie191 wrote:
lol, NXE gets their true widths by doing exactly as I suggested.

But so others seeing some of f the absurdly high estimates should look back over all those assays, and interpret them as being 1/3 thickness of the reported intercept for true width, and about 10% less for the vertical.

Then size that all up and pick whatever method you wish to get average grade, recognize that the vertical shears pinch and swell so the length x depth should be multiplied by a number for thickness that takes into account the pinching and swelling of the width. 50% might not be a bad number.

Now do your calculations and one comes nowheres near some of those absurd estimates.

Why don't you just stay over on the NXE chat and blow your mind off there about the absurdly hi numbers. THere are a couple of others you can party with there, you know have a club, who can do the highest estimate by misrepresenting things.