RE:RE:Too Much Debt + Global Competition = Short....?good idea, kender.
when I look at the case against DH, to me, it appears as though alot of half truths and inuendo is being used as opposed to facts.
the insiders have been selling critique is really far fetched. I guess yes, someone exercised 2140 options in June at a little above $39. But in September someone else purchased more than 3000 shares on the open market. Also since, 2011 insiders and company management have 2bled their holdings of DH. I mean, so if you really think you have a strong case against DH as a fraud, why would you include such obviously incorrect information as part of your thesis.
Same thing with the fundtech issues from 2011. The numbers show those issues are largely behind them, if not entirely behind them. Why would you dress up the "consent letter" like its a brand new issue? If the case against DH is so strong, why would the short sellers put forward such such weak arguments?