RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Citron founder info....from Wikipediadusoft24x7 wrote: Valeant - Citron issue is alike Citron publishing a book containing inaccurate information slandering an individual and making money from sales. The individual has right to take publisher and author of the book and seek damages.
Short Sellers are fine if they play by rules i.e. uncover the information take it to company for confirmation and only if not satisfied by company response then take it to investors. Also, if Citron was a journalist then the news could be justified as long as it is fully established there was no profit/material considerations for the news.
Justifying Citron is like justifying bullies who could scare a kid to death. Truth and Justice demands this Citron owner be legally investigated.
don't blame citron , the rules say shorting is allowed , no law aganst it , then go after option trading , derivatives , on and on , all legal , not ethical but not against the laws .
then lets talk about what the banksters are doing , if your going to try and protect only one company i would argue that your biased and not looking for real justice .