RE:RE:RE:RE:Re Re Re NewsI've seen UraniumGal accidentally create a thread in the same style as torridog... starting a new topic with "Re" in the subject instead of simply hitting reply.
e.g. https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.fcu/fission-energy-corp?postid=24241732
Also, he/she has accidentally responded as Buylow200 to a post addressed to the UraniumGal alias. e.g. https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.fcu/fission-uranium-corp/3?postid=24245893
Most of these aliases were created on August 13th or 14th (Katie83, Mags2001, Bullbaby, MaeveB, Jamsey, Birdie4, Bear80, etc, etc.). Torridog has recently started creating even more aliases, such as Banner60 and Buylow200. None of these aliases post anything of substance. They typically consist of the same garbage arguments... "Too deep", "NI 43-101". They also tend to post in the same forums like FCU, NXE, DML, SVA...
Ask yourself what kind of loser goes through the trouble of creating all these aliases? Why so diligent in rating down NXE posts, rating up FCU posts, and having conversations with themselves between aliases?
Katie83 wrote: All I want to see is your 43-101. It's great to keep telling investors how fabulous your grades are and how many LBS. you think you have. The story can keep getting bigger.....until we see the 43-101. Then it becomes a reality. Like I've said, you cannot make money in underground U mining at these prices. $80 minimum for a mine this deep. JMO
BDMinefinder666 wrote: Kate83, are you a complete idiot? How do gold miners make money down to 2000 metres with 6 gram material or .2 ounces and uranium miners cannot make money at 2% uranium. Please elaborate oh wise one. Also, please elaborate on the cost of FCU's dyke, the mill and tell us how the Saskatchewan government is going to approve FCU's tailings plan......