Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Pilbara Minerals Ord Shs T.PLS


Primary Symbol: PILBF

Pilbara Minerals Limited is an Australia-based lithium company. The Company is primarily engaged in the exploration, development, and mining of minerals in Australia. Its 100% owned Pilgangoora hard-rock lithium operation is located approximately 120 kilometers (kms) from Port Hedland in Western Australia’s resource-rich Pilbara region. The operation consists of two processing plants: the Pilgan Plant, located on the northern side of the Pilgangoora area and produces spodumene and tantalite concentrates, and the Ngungaju Plant is located to the south produces spodumene concentrate. It owns 70% of the Mt Francisco project, which is located 50 km south-west of the Pilgangoora Project and hosts the large occurrence of outcropping pegmatites located nearby to Port Hedland. It is also pursuing a proposed downstream joint venture (JV) for the development of an approximately 43,000 tons per annum (tpa) lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) lithium chemical conversion facility in South Korea.


OTCPK:PILBF - Post by User

Post by FrozenInOntarioon Nov 12, 2015 12:56pm
122 Views
Post# 24285672

Couple of observation on the conference calls

Couple of observation on the conference callsPolaris sounds always like the Cubs, wait till next year. 2 points I did not like : USCR is negociating their raw material contract. And if you listen to USCR conference call, they do not seem to mind throwing their weight around. Ken even alluded to the potential loss of this contract. If this happens, we will be able to buy at lower level like the Voodoo guy predicted. The other point is how to get to the 6 millions tons per year. Question was at the end of the conference call. Ken mentionned that SF cannot absorb much more than what they ship overthere as they are limited by the receiving terminal capacity. And PLB is permitted for 1 MTA. Herb contradicted him right after. So who is right ? I like this co, but gee, saying that they will attain 6 MTA in what year ??? This might be attainable but the cycle might be getting long in the tooth. So overall, great projets, a ton of value, but gee these guys are not moving fast enough it seems to capitalize on what they have available. And this creates some risks. Regards,
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>