RE:RE:Significant Insider Buying!!!You claim to be a research outfit but your first post on here is in response to a post someone made of your supposed analysis on google docs? Real analysts and reseachers do not publish on google docs. Also most of that info is a straight copy and paste. You mention you are a research outfit of SurgeTraders, however this is not mentioned in the disclaimer in the supposed research piece on google docs (which incidentally you could edit but I have copied to make sure I catch any shenanigans). Instead it says that you are "a research team formed out of the personal interest of seasoned investors." Basically nothing. You are one or a group of traders. You claim to hold a securities, in the interest of full disclosure what is this licence? You also mention that your reports are more DD rather than a recommendation. Can you please direct me to another one of your "reports"? Most troubling and telling is your repeated use of the word cyclicality. First of all, not sure how you are able to determine cyclicality from a single quarter as by definition you would have to look at an entire year. Secondly, it seems like it is some sort of strange attempt to cast doubt.....as you would give it a price target of 80 if they can solve the cyclicality? The reality is many companies display cyclical earnings just by the very nature of a fiscal vs calendar year. Cyclicality is not something to be solved. Your smoke and mirrors may confuse the odd novice investor, but anyone who understands analysis or financials can tell you don't know what you are talking about. When I initially read the post I thought it was by a novice investor trying to do some of their own analysis, so I praised the attempt and asked what I hoped were constructive questions. As it is now clear that you are attempting to appear as something else entirely my suggestion is you take whatever game you are playing and go do it somewhere else.
PNResearch wrote: I hope we see more! Btw, do you know whats up with the "cyclicality" in the Q1 of this stock? Its so odd to me.