RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Selling Ice in the Winter and Boats in the DesertRe-check your dates and your facts, Junglej. You're jumbling and bungling things left and right and it's nice to think you're just a solitary warrior upset about the past and incapable of adapting to the new lay of the land. There's a lot of that going around.
I suspect there's a lot more going on, though. You first appeared on Stockhouse as "Junglej" shortly before the appeals trial began, yet recently you maintained that you've always been opposed to going to trial in the first place. Is this another one of your "oops" moments? What was your previous moniker and why did you feel the need to change it, eh? Nevertheless your main effort since joining Stockhouse has been to become an expert on my years of bullboard posts, improperly characterizing them in order to discredit not only me, but Teuton and Mr. Cremonese as well. Why would you undertake such a task, given that the trial had concluded long ago and each company now faces its future with the share structure and debt situation that are in place today? Even recently you implied that American Creek's main objective should be to get as much money out of Teuton as it can, totally disregarding the likely consequences to American Creek's shareholders and which hardly is a plan to elevate share prices. Regardless, whatever your mental situation or the conspiratorial possibilities, you still refuse to offer anything that might raise the share prices of both companies. This seems very strange. Even Misty has provided some sort of solution. But not you. Perhaps the next set of financials due in a few days will inspire you to entertain greater thought for our futures. Perhaps it won't change a thing.
So I'll give you another chance. What do you think of my 60/40 idea? I think both sets of shareholders would benefit.