RE:Dundee David Talbot warns wrt Oversight/Russian GovtThere are very clear reasons to vote in favor of the dissident board. The benefits, including strategic investments, would likely come AFTER Dev and the rest of his board are voted out. Of course Bay Street 'ho's like Dundee and Sprott would be opposed because they would be cut out of any future financings. By the way, how much did FCU pay for this opinion? Rover90 wrote: Dundee David Talbot made the recent comments:
1. Proposed directors fail to impress. One or two of these names do peak curiosity due to their pedigree; however, we would warn that getting the Russian Government involved at the director level of Fission Uranium at this stage, with no initial benefit to Fission Uranium (such as strategic investment), would not likely be an advantage when it comes time to find such strategic partners.
2. It makes no sense to give Rosatom, one of the most uranium hungry companies in the world, a foot in the door on 106 MM lbs of high grade uranium in the best jurisdiction in the world at no cost.
3. Oversight’s Comrade Olga Wills, Advisor to the President, Rusatom Overseas – promotes Russian construction of nuclear power plants for Rosatom