RE:RE:RE:FDA Letter w/online petition.....perhaps it is an accelerated stages of mourning process but I have gone from disappointment to pure anger at what happened yesterday. To you your point about a petition, I think that anything is best generated from the patient/ urology perspective. anything shareholder driven will be brushed away as a greed play. with that said, I could be incorrect, but I think that meeting was very thinly broadcast and its result known to few if any people suffering from the disease. If I were struggling with bladder cancer and it was brought to my attention that my only current shot at a second option was dismissed by a half informed panel, against the advice of the majority of Urologists in attendance I would want to go nuclear. in a "who gave you the Fu$&@-g right to make a decision against the majority of experts in their field" kind of manner. Not for the 7th option at my disposal, the second. As a patient The second option is often death. in that context the lazy, pre determined , half processed discussion was incredibly callous. With death being the alternative I think BC sufferers had a right to a just debate, where Urology experience carried more weight than it did.