RE:RE:RE:We shouldn't be in this positionHey I think Miss Champaign did an admirable job in the circumstances. But there was a billion dollar plus opportunity, and a game changing treatment for BC patients riding on that presentation and its merits that may have gone up in F&$@;g smoke. I don't know whether they needed more company representation or higher level executive support but they were not prepared for the pushback and to a large extent she was all alone on some pretty aggressive drill down questioning. Was it fair? No. Was it Relevant? Not as it related to the MCNA submission itself. But as we know whatever the Telesta deficiency was, it contributed to a no vote.