Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by sudzie191on Nov 20, 2015 9:40am
74 Views
Post# 24308735

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ainsworth's Big Mistake

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ainsworth's Big MistakeYes Sasku  - and exactly how would the diplomat Bell know what on earth he was approving, same with Olga?  

What you seem to say, is we could nominate people like Sarah Palin to the Board and she would do a good job. What was her famous asnwer on what she knows about Russian relations?  I can see it  across from Alaska when I drive my SUV, lol 

That dysfunction slate of misfits would certainly be independent, independent of anything of any use to FCU, lol. For Board meetings that lasted all day, one would have to wake them up from their afternoon nap to vote.



sasku3o8 wrote: Greenday Boards are there to approve transactions, not to facilitate and negotiate, and certainly not to run day to day operations. That's why a management team is hired. And how would any of the proposed board members have had the chance to visit the site previously if they haven't been a board member or part of management. Talk about circular logic. Any, if they visit the site, they will see a road, and some trees, a lake, and drill rigs. It's not like it's some functioning mine. The tour would last about 30 minutes. Any purchaser will be talking with the CEO, who has been to the site.


Bullboard Posts