why 2011?Why are they looking at 2011? If you look at the 2011 annual report there is a discussion about income taxes on page 22. As of Dec. 2011 $235.2 million remains to be recovered in the cost recovery pool representing BNK's cumulative capex of $577.4 million. Although BNK did report an operating profit that year the capex wasn't recovered. It's possible that this is the bone on contention. I'm no accountant , but to a layman, this could be a very simple problem to resolve. I mean BNK reports capex every QTR. The lower the capex the better no? Unless the ALBS are going to challenge every expense through an audit it seems to me this is a slam dunk. There is no motivation for BNK to cheat on what they spent? That year BNK posted a net income of $36 million. This could be just an over zealous finance minister trying to make a name for themselves.