Big dollar big vote!No one denies that the big dollars gets the big votes. That is something every novice knows that invests in stocks. I do not try to intentionally misrepresent anything. To even suggest that I do not understand that concept is an attempt to undermine the reality of the present day situation of FCU. Sounds like desperation to mute the truth. Looks like I hit a little nerve!
Only a simpleton would ignore the obvious and come to that conclusion!
Perhaps you (Greenday/Gigantapithic) have missed your grade one reading lesson to "read with understanding".
Do you (Greenday) know what the term "example" means"? Seems that there are several on this board that have a hard time with the term UNKNOWN. Gigantapithic's new calculations (no doubt using his total 10 shares as an example) prove my point exactly; you can use any number of variables to make them say what ever advantage you are seeking. I even put unknown in bold letters so that the message couldn't be misconstrued or misrepresented.
The main point was and is: Whatever the unknown outcome of vote/voters etc. ........ those numbers should not be used to make it appear as if most voters wanted the present status quo to continue, or, to think that most voters were for the merger or that even most voters were happy with present goings on. We do not even know if all voters really voted. That is the misrepresentation, to make those assumptions!!
Maligning Ben Ainsworth is another attempt by pathetics to undermine his credibility and good name. Poor taste and classless! Whatever his personal family situation is, is entirely his own business, not anybody else's to try to judge him in poor light! Outsiders do not have all the facts.
Maligning Ben does not make Dev look any better.
Sooner or later, FCU management will have to give account for whatever their actions.
Two more ignores!!