RE:RE:RE:B&HIt sounds like young Mr. Basso is putting in the hours to advance his career as an expert citing Alice in court but if he cites 80 references in 20 minutes then there will be a lot of documentation and quite possibly Judge lioi will be obligated to offer a written explanation for denying every one of the 80 references. It seems to be an acceptable abuse of the system to continually delay court proceedings in this way but all the lawyers would be onside with it as they bill monthly. I was just reading an old analyst report that estimated the trial would begin in January 2015 but now it might be delayed until the summer and that would explain the lower share price we are seeing.
There will be multiple grounds for appeal - that`s a given - but I also seem to recall from the previous CAFC hearings that the judges on the panel don`t suffer fools easily and will be quick to shut down anything that borders on ludicrous. The lawyers really have to know their stuff for that hearing and that`s probably why Sheehan showed up when he did - no room for error.
I don`t remember anything about court restrictions on documentation but I do remember the patent office had some very strict rules; like 15 pages max, everything double spaced, the colour of the ink and maybe even the font size and type. I suppose those rules came about when the patent office found themselves overloaded with paper.