OTCPK:PILBF - Post by User
Comment by
seatleslimon Nov 26, 2015 12:21pm
123 Views
Post# 24328361
RE:RE:RE:RE:New Low
RE:RE:RE:RE:New LowI think the price to sales ration is relevant and a good point, but needs to always be in industry-specific context. For example, VMC is selling at 4.5X sales, which is a function of existing margins and expected operating leverage going forward. Hard to know what the right ratio is for PLS, but it is in flux with volumes, price and margins. Remember the volume disruption occurred just as prices were increased. Hopefully "normalized" revenue is higher than LTMs, or current run rate. And then there is also the value of non-earning or revenue generating reserves reserves. VMC of course has this also, but relative to existing operations and all of the other qualitative measure, are PLS's more valuable ton-for-ton? It would seem that PLS has more room for margin improvement than VMC (notwithstanding its great prospects).