RE:RE:RE:RE:how good was TST's preparation and AdCom Strategy???
arghh,
yes sort of maybe but likely, IMO the VP was out of her "pay grade" when not just factualizing which b) is about....it is more interpretative and more sophisticated and flexible way of looking at patients compared to what was formally presented at 301 inclusion/exclusion criteria, etc...and as best i remember it was not part of the core presentation (which likely would not have been appropriate)..it would be like asking a bookeeper to speculate an answer to a tax law question, teh CEO/CSO or COO should have been to deal with the more difficult questions.. i expected the VP to know the 301 trial cold which she did but not know everything and BTW she is a scientist so she answered as a scientist which is not always the best