RE:RE:current boardStanley, please explain to us all how "success" fails to include the bottom line - a better share price. If possible, please do so without the use of words/phrases/other excuses to use the "/".
Nobody disputes that we have a great RRR deposit, multiple other conductors to explore, favourable PEA and so on. The disconnect of share price is what's troubling me, and many others who are SHAREHOLDERS, not "purloiners" or some other imaginary group of conspirators. We feel that all the "purloining" is happening right in the FCU Boardroom, every time another round of options, raises, etc is agreed upon and granted to themselves by themselves.
Some of us feel that the market/investment community shares our attitude/sentiment, and is staying away until/unless/ we have assurances/written statements from Dev/Dev/Dev/the board that going forward, money will be spent carefully/prudently/appropriately. And mergers that aren't to SHs' advantage WON'T be entertained/considered/proposed.
If you have your own money at stake here, as I do, what's wrong/suspicious/underhanded about that?