OTCPK:EUCTF - Post by User
Comment by
shawshankon Nov 28, 2015 10:29pm
111 Views
Post# 24335646
RE:Visibilty
RE:Visibiltymarketsense wrote: SS, if everyone was as bullish as you are( and with good reason) EUO would be trading North
of .40 right now. The problem still is, that nobody else is aware of these developements except
the posters on this board and other holders who can't be bothered with posting. I have Been lamenting about this/that truly "correctible" discrepancy for some time now. As of today,
EUO has virtually "O" visibility in the publics consciousness. Agreed-sadly. If EUO is going to get even North of .30, the visibility factor needs to raised by an extensive PR campaign funded out of somethe $16M cash they're getting. Agreed again. This would be an excellent use of some of it and would show a
high return for use of capital IMO. Agreed a 3rd time. I understand that mgmnt needs to wait until the deal is ratified by shareholders but after that there can be no excuses for failing to pound the table. Do they now? Cuz According to the post that RomanQueen copied earlier from Ivillage or whatever it was called...that RomanQ linked earliertoday Rowlands disclosed in a phone call that he is so bullish he is NOT WAITING for the shareholder ratification vote and returning to land of the cheese (Swiss) to participate in SICPA's GFI Marketing based on market interest/immediate opportunitiers at hand and communicated such to inquiring minds. They view the shareholders input as obviously from a ratification vote as inconsequential to future direction and ongoing operations and a fait d' compli. I wish Rowlands would and could be quoted saying stuff like that in a public domain especially third party sponsored vs one shareholders ear with access to Rowlands private line-cuz that's the kind of stuff we need to start seeing and hearing. One ear vs 20,000 does not have the same effect.
While SIPCA may be private, EUO is not and its visibility needs a lot of lifting. Agreed.