Eurocontrol Technics Ord EUCTF

RE:RE:Visibility ad nauseum

[shawshank]

One of the most lame posts I have seen in a long long time. UNBELIEVABLEY NAIVE and IGNORANT of what is being discussed between meaningless promotion and meaningfull sponsorship (PR).

Were at .16 per share you jackazz...UNBELIEVABLE.

SS

metals_boom wrote: marketsense, I couldn't disagree with you more on this point. Investors will ALWAYS find highly successful, profitable companies with or without extensive promotion. Adding a ton of promotional activity does several thing - it brings in the daytraders, hedge funds and manipulators in general (not good in my opinion), it attracts eyes onto a stock, yes, but if they are the aforementioned type then why would you want those? A Venture Exchange stock I know very well rose 5,000% in the last few years with pretty much ZERO promotion. Its share price performance alone was enough to attract canny investors who did their own DD and found the company. They didn't need some promoter who works more like a used car salesman to tout the company all over the place. Ultimately fundamentals win out, not momentum on a share price (that goes both directions). If you concentrate on executing the business plan and are very successful, you will not have any problem attracting investors and a higher, much higher, share price. All I can say is in my time investing (17 years, going on 18), the best and most successful companies invariably had the LEAST amount of promotion - they didn't need it and they didn't need to raise money from the market. That's the key. If you're a gold exploration stock, then its a different ball game as all you have is 'potential' and are years if not decades away from actually maybe becoming profitable. Lets see this company execute and not throw money away on promoting how great they are and the share price will follow.