RE:BTW if one notices the absence...?SS you are truly delusional, I have not posted here since I posted that link from SIPCA because I haven't had anthing constructive to contribute to the conversation here and don't have time to waste on your delusional ramblings, the same reason why many have put you on ignore. I don't think you need to read T
he 7 Habits of Highly Effective People to understand that wasting time reading your baseless drivel is a completely unproductive use of our time, consequently you have racked up 320 IGNORES! Get a grip man, look at the facts, do you really think people value your opinion?
Again, if you have actually read and understood the discosure rules, you should understand that it's not just legal, but it actually common practice for companies of all sizes to include contact information at the end of their press releases to encourage investors and anyone else interested to call and discuss the non-material details of the business activities, goals, objectives, operations, and philosophy to anyone so motivated to pick up the phone and call and engage in a respectfull conversation. This is common practice and completely legal, so long as he information is not "material". There is a specific definition of "material included in Regulation FD that I suggest you get familiar with, although it the definition also extends into interpretation of past case law as well, it should be fairly clear to anyone with any kind of a grasp on reality that it is okay to discuss these non-material aspects of a company's business. Here is a relavent quote for you to ponder:
"While it is not possible to create an exhaustive list, the following items are some types of information or events that should be reviewed carefully to determine whether they are material: (1) earnings information; (2) mergers, acquisitions, tender offers, joint ventures, or changes in assets; (3) new products or discoveries, or developments regarding customers or suppliers (e.g., the acquisition or loss of a contract); (4) changes in control or in management; (5) change in auditors or auditor notification that the issuer may no longer rely on an auditor's audit report; (6) events regarding the issuer's securities -- e.g., defaults on senior securities, calls of securities for redemption, repurchase plans, stock splits or changes in dividends, changes to the rights of security holders, public or private sales of additional securities; and (7) bankruptcies or receiverships.47
By including this list, we do not mean to imply that each of these items is perse material. The information and events on this list still require determinations as to their materiality (although some determinations will be reached more easily than others). For example, some new products or contracts may clearly be material to an issuer; yet that does not mean that all product developments or contracts will be material. This demonstrates, in our view, why no "bright-line" standard or list of items can adequately address the range of situations that may arise. Furthermore, we do not and cannot create an exclusive list of events and information that have a higher probability of being considered material."
What's more, your suggenstion that the company get a PR firm for "sponsorship" to promote every little non-material detail of their operations and partners business is completely absurd and would not only diminish the company's reputation to that of pump and dump trash, but would also jeapordize it's relationship with it's new partner.
Furthermore, anyone with any kind of understanding of the reality of working within government(s) and their consultants and contractors should also realize that public companies working on these kind of programs are more likely to request "confidential treatment" of their contractual arrangements and scope of work, much more than they are likely to tout it or promote it. It should be fairly obvious to anyone who has visited SIPCA's news feed that they aren't real big on discussing their contractual relationships with govermnments, so expecting that they will allow Eurocontrol (or Xenometrics) to make announcements about contract wins is showing a complete lacking of common sense.