The whole truthPut this to rest. Sirknight/dailin/forrest, I literally cannot fathom how uninformed/unintelligent you are. You've posted thousands of times across multiple forums for years, and yet, you literally do not know any thing more about the market today than in your first post.
With regards to the R/S, and I don't need to call Cory to confirm this, but when SDI 1 closes and price trades north of .80 in 2016 (and less than $2 as per fundamentals on year one of both contracts), the R/S will be a tool to uplist to the NASDAQ for price discovery, and will be used should they need to use it. There is no world in which we live where a R/S and the closing of this contract can't coincide and work together. We trade on the TSX and pink sheets, and the pink sheets ticker needs to go. Listing requirements dictate we be at $2 for sustained time to uplist, at which point visibility will increase 10 fold, along with institutional ownership (aka non special situation funds). I value SDI 1 around .75/share on first year and around 1.35 on second year.. with SDI 2 I get an additional .50/share first year if it's also a 2 year project, so, from a value perspective I can understand that trading at $2 during year 1 with 2 contracts in operation is still a premium and a multiple I wouldn't expect from the TSX on a cashflow basis, and should not be expected, but retail just gets greedy and expects the company to suddenly just become a billion dollar company overnight.. remember, you are retail, retail thinks like retail, thank god Intermap has a level head and doesn't think like you. As well, Intermap has analysts waiting to initiate coverage on this upon closure. But analysts also don't like pumping otc tickers to their clients, some actually are not allowed.. Barring an unforeseen miracle where the market in Canada and on the OTC just goes haywire, we will not be expected to see sustained prices over $2 in the first half of 2016. However, if we are trading around 1.25, then all we would need is a split 2 for 1 then we could uplist to NASDAQ and from there we all know price could go back to levels a decade ago. You don't get there with a company headquartered and operated in the U.S. and abroad (no canadian revenues), when they trade in Canada.. this is an American story, and is trading at a discount due to it's primary listing being in Canada.