RE:RE:RE:"Black Box WARNING"...
18tee, this endo stuf is just more BB idiocy, that has gone on here for years....but re. an Endo backed AdCom participant who knows not me for sure...but i will tell you this i had expected a split but positive Adcom decsion by profiling the participants...i would expect and demand that TST execs knew in detail with expected 90% confidence of base line how each member would vote (i did my research based on area of expertise, etc.)...so they should've know x of x urologists would vote yes, that x of x stats would vote yes, etc. their plan then should've been primarily focussed on the "fence sitters" who were swayable, but alas it seems with no CEO/CSO or COO they never even entered into that arena to fight for MCNA...if one Adcom member can sway voters than, assuming MCNA is approvable (i do), then shame on TST execs for not crafting and delivering better communications, to counter him.
ps i bet ipsen and yankee money agree with me