Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by sudzie191on Dec 09, 2015 10:04am
134 Views
Post# 24368576

RE:In Retrospect

RE:In RetrospectSo Stanley, just to cut out the lengthy foreplay, lol, you think the bashers are trying to get FCU as low as possible to load up again, knowing that Dev and Ross are safe on the vote, and with their great track record will deliver.

People of the magnificent character of these bashers would never do a sneaky thing like that, would they?

Take for example, giz62, and teevee, and especially MissingA9, just hard to think they would ever do anything like that.


But in and out of NXE and FCU with 50,000 shares for just a 5 cent scalp is good coing, better than driving a bus. Better than trading those oil stocks that are getting creamed too.

I did a quick count yesterday, about 24 bashers, trying to get this lower to load up. Like can it get any more obvious?

Giffy has quite a team, but according to him this would be good governance, lol.

You know just pass out the contact information of all shareholders, so I can misuse it, give it to Olga.



stanley wrote:Lurk & Learns:

Sometimes in looking back we may get some clues as to the who, what, why, where, when & how. Notice I said sometimes.

In light of yesterdays CF trading, I suggest a review of Oct 15th post merger results Ron Chang interview on BNN with MH. Maybe DML or FCU were not available to do an interview? But I digress.

ANyway, more to my point, if that is even possible; but call be a skeptic/cynnic; but how is it possible to make a statement followed with words like: we estimate xxxx mln pounds without footnoting, caveat, citation the stamped work of QUALIFIED, INDEPENDENT, CIMM NI 43-101 resource estimate?

BNN interview

My point being, when people like RR speak, is this the holy water we were expecting, with the likes of FE being prepared to put their clients money to work.

SOme think that we could be seeing the early signs of the input for a Caribbean delicacy, "Shark & Bake"? Meaning, institutions DO NOT invest when there is any appearance of (even feigned) dissent & litigious activity.

Did the sharks create this dissent to load up on the cheap? In which case maybe Kingsdale, Blake/Cassels may still have some unfinished business. e.g. would someone doing a recent financing be the source of FCU bash and buying?

Or, in a court of law, would that be called tactical or strategic investing?

BWDIK? Cryptic but translucent. Is the governor off or just RR's holy water at work?

DYODD - GLAP

Cheers
Stanley







Bullboard Posts