RE:RE:Samson, Samdm et alsamson1234 wrote: for you to have gone back and looked at my post over a week ago.......tells me that what I said is resonating in your mind...and your scared shitless and u have good reason to be.......do u think im some stupid retail fart like u........the reason it is taking so long is because in my opinion they are fighting over the treatment over the purchase price of all the transactions in the past and how it will be reflected on the balance sheet and income statement in terms of goodwill.......that's the issue moron.......add the end of day don't be surprised if you see a write-down........and yes I did work in one of the top 3 accounting firms
For the record, I was the one who cited your earlier post, not ChartSchool who is clearly delusional. I brought it up because I have taken note of Dedo's and your posts since you arrived, you guys have been right for a long time and I don't lynch people with different opinions when forming an investment thesis. Investing is not binary as SteveO and his aliases so desperately want to believe. Retail investors who short a 50/50 stock (whom are in the dark with no access to mgmt or auditors) are fools just as much as longs who choose to ignore reality. Posts do not influence the stock price, some are here to simply discern fact from fiction from those who know and have a right to debate. Holding a stock is not a prerequisite to post. Some posters know a lot, they've been correct for months, that's why I don't ignore them.