Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Liminal BioSciences Inc. LMNL

Liminal BioSciences is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel, small molecule drug candidates for the treatment of patients suffering from fibrotic or inflammatory diseases that have a high unmet medical need. Liminal BioSciences operates on an integrated basis from our talent hubs in Laval, Quebec, Canada, and Cambridge, UK. Our common shares are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market.


NDAQ:LMNL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Qh1234on Dec 10, 2015 8:00pm
203 Views
Post# 24375210

RE:RE:RE:little predictive model

RE:RE:RE:little predictive model
Sorry about the difficulty to read the text message as BB automatically collapsed my sentences and paragraphs. :( Barecode & Charlie_Chan: In my model, I used a time-series variable and a whole bunch of dummy variables. I checked the autocorrelation between SP (at close time) and the time-series variable, and I found a strong positive correlation. Note that, in security analysis, autocorrelation has an important application as mentioned by Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/autocorrelation.asp The correlation partially explains why the adjusted R-spr is high. Skyhigh123: About the data set, to avoid confusion, I copied and repasted below the 2 data sets, one with actuals and the other one with prediction, so people can read and reuse the data. Actual data Date Actual_Val 10/09/2015 1.91 10/13/2015 1.88 ... 11/11/2015 2.63 11/12/2015 2.61 11/13/2015 2.70 11/16/2015 2.85 11/17/2015 2.86 11/18/2015 2.93 11/19/2015 2.96 11/20/2015 2.95 11/23/2015 2.87 11/24/2015 2.95 11/25/2015 3.18 11/26/2015 3.3 11/27/2015 3.37 11/30/2015 3.54 12/01/2015 3.14 12/02/2015 3.07 12/03/2015 2.95 12/04/2015 3.02 12/07/2015 3.22 12/08/2015 3.31 12/09/2015 3.12 12/10/2015 12/11/2015 Prediction Date Pred_Val 10/09/2015 1.67 10/13/2015 1.72 ... 11/11/2015 2.54 11/12/2015 2.61 11/13/2015 2.69 11/16/2015 2.78 11/17/2015 2.73 11/18/2015 2.78 11/19/2015 2.80 11/20/2015 2.90 11/23/2015 2.95 11/24/2015 2.93 11/25/2015 2.99 11/26/2015 3.04 11/27/2015 3.10 11/30/2015 3.18 12/01/2015 3.10 12/02/2015 3.19 12/03/2015 3.25 12/04/2015 3.27 12/07/2015 3.35 12/08/2015 3.34 12/09/2015 3.39 12/10/2015 3.45 12/11/2015 3.51 Hope this help. GLTA qh1234
Bullboard Posts