Eurocontrol Technics Ord EUCTF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Addendum

[shawshank]

shawshank wrote: CORRECTED

zenvesting wrote: It takes a long time to do proper due dilligence for an acquisition, this getting wrapped-up within a year of when SIPCA initially expressed interest is actually fairly quick when you consider all the details disclosed in the information circular. Not really CIRUCULARS are by nature overburden with information-EUO is a small company with a small footprint....with world beating technology but not a world wide footprint...the deal between Dow Chemical- Dupont$130Billion deal once recieving regulatory approval will not take as long as what it has taken for the whale (SICPA) buying the Minnow's (EUO) one  single operating arm  GFI/Petromark-this was not and should not have been a year long onerous affair. The timing might not be great for a hot trade in the market, but it's more than adequate to build a strong business going forward, were not concerned about timing as much as lack of visiblity/transparency and disclosure.  that will reward true long term shareholders in due time. The time is now,  Contradictory statement your making...first your saying the timing may not be good and reward comes in due time then your saying "The Time is Now".  Which is is...I would say the time of urgency for EUO was like...yesterday--- but lets be the devils advocate....Yes "the time is now"  that's what Rowlands told you in private vs public conversation and heading to Switzerland to aid in marketing efforts AHEAD of we the shareholders ratifying the vote.  SIPCA is not worried about waiting for this deal to close to begin marketing,  It  could actually be a regulatory body faux pas for SICPA to be doing any marketing ahead of a ratification vote but bully for them...CUZ Rowlands on the PR side for EUO is doing zilch by comparison.... they stole the key cookies from the existing cookie Eurocontrol cookie jar and they know it...b so why wouldn't SICPA be giddy? aquiring world leading..best of breed...only ISO certificiable fuel marking technology available today.....they should be higher then a kite in reality....giddy with glee...but where is Rowlands out pounding the PR and investement table like SICPA with the GFI  by comparison?  Educating aind informing the market and investment community how good this deal is for EUO shareholders for investment return...his expectations...on a go forward basis...why are you SO SUPPORTIVE of SICPA marketing and pounding the table AHEAD of the ratification vote BUT NOT Rowlands on our behalf? HUH?? here's another exciting news item from SIPCA  WRONG THIS MARKETING AHEAD OF THE VOTE WAS IS AND REMAINS NOT NEWS IT WAS FIRST CONTAINED IN A POST YOU PUT OUT VIOLATING REG FD. RULES AND REGULATIONS. This week in the international community and a newly trademarked name for GFI's technology Why should this be not surprising given SICPA is pounding the table ALREADY ahead of  the vote no doubt happy with glee they picked up GFI for just $16million up front....BUT what is surprising is that this trademark info ahead a ratification agreement is available given THERE IS NOT DEFINTIIVE AGREEMENT IN PLACE BEFORE THE RATIFICATION VOTE IS TABLED-that's why its called a ratification vote you flatulent jackass...out there to be found by those ambitious enough to do a little due dilligence.  DUE DILIGENCE IS NOT THE SAME AS HAVING PRIVATE DUE DIALOGUE WITH THE CEO  AS YOU HAVE BRAZENLY PUT UP IN A POST AND BEING POINTED OUT OR GIVEN DIRECTIONS TO NFORMATION THAT IS NOT YET MADE AVAILABLE TO THE INVESTMENT COMMUNITY.  SEE PREVIOUS POSTS REGARDING 'THE UNLEVEL PLAYING FIELD' AND REG FD CONCERNS directed your way to your past posting behaviour. IMO Your arrogance with access will eventually catch up with you as I have opened up a file of these types of posts you have authored that if sufficent in amount?  and felt warranted to proceed to the securities regulators ...in any event we will see what the Chairman of the BOD (Rowlands) has to say about your inability to keep things private once I talk to the party AFTER the shareholders Ratifty the definitive agreement with SICPA-not before but after as there is no Definitive Agreement till the shareholders weigh in...will it be ratified...yes but that is not the issue.
The market rewards tho-It should be an interesting conversation...and if I get thru as my getting thru is not a forgone conclusion like yourself...i will put up word for word what took place in regards to posts appearing on this thread QUOTING ` the company principals word for word  on non public information...Hey...save me some time will ya? what is the extension number tagain...maybe get Kid to email me Rowlands cell number when you get time...that will help speed up the process.SS