bulava wrote: Serious question @quakes:
In 2013-2014, you endlessly promoted FCU with your own research, resource estimates, share price extrapolations, and potential mine plans: all without a published 43-101 RE or PEA, and based entirely on non-43101-compliant FCU news releases and your own analyses.
Now in 2015, NXE is currently proving up a massive resource next-door, and you immediately apply criticism on any estimates that support NXE in the same way you did for FCU.
This exemplifes why no one takes your posts seriously.
Although your attempts at 'managing the message' on the bullboard have been clever, thankfully you have been exposed time and time again.
Its quite entertaining watching the spin-machine crash. Pass the popcorn.
quakes99 wrote: A merger with NexGen is totally ridiculous! They have no NI 43-101 Maiden Resource Estimate, no Preliminary Economic Assessment... NOTHING... NADA... Just News Releases and their own in-house estimates along with non-compliant guesses by certain Analysts.
We just got rid of the Denison and Overhang anchors. Why would we want to dilute ourselves against a completely unconfirmed and unquantified resource?????? Nuts!!!!!!!
We can talk when they have that Maiden Resource Estimate published and a PEA to go with it. Fission is at least 18 months ahead of NexGen in proving up, confirming, and de-risking the resource through an independent Resource Estimate and PEA.
Fission is the real deal with the reports done by Canadian Institue of Mining standards, filed on SEDAR. Stick with what you know is verified... not with what you don't really know (yet).