RE:RE:Could be worsebigbird456 wrote: radar17 wrote: EXX could have paid through the nose for an interest in the immediately adjacent Bearcat#4 well. Another poster on the CRS website just discovered an undisclosed (that's gonna be a major problem right there) flow test result on the Texas State website dated way back July 2 (just prior to a whole bunch of insider selling - and that's gonna be another major problem right there) that showed a .... 3 barrel per day flow rate and no gas.
And that is not a typo...
The good news is Bearcat 4 was a vertical well and Clayton1H is a horizontal and could have as much as 5 - 7 times the amount of a vertical in the same formation; the bad news is the 3 bpd came from the Palo Pinto fm, the Gardner Lime fm, that was targetted by the Clayton1H well, didn't produce any oil.
Sorry for your troubles.
radar I can tell u this now that is 100% false as the bearcat just came online 1 month ago. Keep bashing though bud. U no I no the bearcat is gas locked which will be fix. After the clayton is completed
radar the actually flow test numbers were disclosed, the 3 bod you're referring to was an exploratory test on the gardner lime which the company said was gas-locked (which is why there was no flow from it).
the offical test results, flowing from ALL zones was 180 bod. you're touched in the head.