RE:Prior Art and Patent Re-exam...a very informative post,LVB...(as was that provided by the '...heap
...after reading the report, there were many questions/uncertainties floating in my head as to just what is CTXS doing and what do they know that we don't, a la LOGMI, maybe. ONE of those uncertainties was the prior art section and the allowing of that to be presented at trial, with the safety net for ONE being able to 'object' to proir information before and during the reexamination. Your insight here does provide some comfort as to prior art not being as big an obstacle as previously thought. Of course, this is just a 'post', the real strength comes during trial. I/we certainly hope and have to have Faith that B&H are totally prepared to counteract to this CTXS attack.
...now, all that being said, and I'm sure ivnestors/funds/people in the know, can also figure this 'prior art' smokescreen as being just that, a CTXS ploy to confuse the jury on the real issue of infringement and wilful damage, then why is the SP NOT climbing to newer levels? Does the LOGMI case still linger like a dark cloud over the proceedings even though AC/BOD's seem very confident and where they want to be with regards to their trial position? I think all of us would feel a lot better if we saw positive movement from the Market, for, as the Market speaks so does our confidence in a positive settlement/trial victory.
...have a good 01
...golferguy
PS Have a HNY all 01 sh's