RE:Court RulingHey Red...let me get this straight...you're saying that the court ruling hinged on NOT being solvent or not and that it will go in their favour now that they have taken on more DEBT...No really! Firstly, Don't you think that the ruling would be based on established laws supported by precedent... and secondly if your argument had any basis in principle, don't you think that the ruling would be influenced by NOT's ability to build their road not just the capacity to accumulate more DEBT. No really! I am not against NOT but if your going to make predictions, at least support them with sensible arguments. GLTA KWG long term shareholders Pear3