RE:disputegrantoue wrote: sounds like the dispute is mainly over the very large amounts of delutants that were used to recover the oil in 2011 and the amount used now to recover the same amount.. BNK says the technology and equipment used in later years changed the consumption of delutant. i was told the initial audit took 14 months too examine 400 pages of reciepts and BNk believes the dispute will be resolved in the next month.
I didn't know that was what the ALBS were questioning. That sounds pretty stupid. I really don't know how the ALBS would know the amount of diluent required. If that were the case, then where is the extra money? I hardly think BNK would challenge the tax authority if the expense was not above board. It will be nice to get this sorted next month, because this is complete BS.