RE:RE:RE:disputebraincloud wrote: Maybe you ought to do some reading first to understand what's what. It doesn't involve a challenge. Please do some research beforehand.
Of course it's a challenge. They're not accepting the ALBS position, are they? I've done plenty of reading. You tell me where it says that the ALBS claim the diluent amount used in 2011 is what they are questioning? I thought the issue was untendered contracts.