RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Observations on possibility of a distribution cutPokerchamp wrote: Here is what Brookfield Asset Partners says about distributions.
We believe that a distribution of 60% to 70% of funds from operations (FFO) will allow us to meet these objectives.
So it's not necessary for a company to pay 100% of FFO or AFFO apparently.
I agree 100%. The amount of distributions is based on taxable income not FFO, AFFO or any other measure. DREAM has historically paid ~100% of AFFO so that must be a fair proxy for taxable income. Brookfield has a different proxy to accomplish the same thing.
It is a common mistake to believe REITs are tax free, tax exempt, non taxable..... Unlike companies REIT are permitted to take as a deduction from taxable income the amount of distributions paid to unit holders.