RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Another Thing Point to Amber Capital "Friendly" Bid The clear way to permitting was determined by the Paramo declaration over a year ago in December of 2014, with several PP there after. IF Amber were truly interested in taking Eco private they indeed would have been accumulating at bargain basement prices, not just cutting a check for their "pledged" share of these PP as a major shareholder. I would wager they have not in all this time spent $1 dollar on the cheap shares to be had in the open market.
I will wager with you (if you admit you are wrong) that Amber Capital is NOT going to make a bid to take it private & that the next PP will follow the same lines as all the others with Amber cutting a check for their percentage of those shares being offered in the PP. As I said you love to generate these "hot off the presses" senarios, but never own up to your misses or ever revisit the many many conclusions, pure entertainment with no consequences. Come on own up, you have a very long documented list of "ideas" that have totally missed the mark. No need for Amber to immediately have a new "Board member" if actually nothing out of the ordinary is in the works. Doesn't that prove there is in fact no Amber take over really being considered? If in fact there were a bid in the works, Amber would indeed be pressing for an immediate, designated replacement. You undermine your own positions. I am a shareholder & I approve this message. LOL Own Up, Schiff! GLTA