Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Ucore Rare Metals Inc. V.UCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  UURAF

Ucore is focused on rare and critical-metal resources, extraction, beneficiation, and separation technologies with the potential for production, growth, and scalability. Ucore's vision and plan is to become a leading advanced technology company, providing best-in-class metal separation products and services to the mining and mineral extraction industry.


TSXV:UCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Imprinton Jan 28, 2016 3:07pm
223 Views
Post# 24502867

RE:Seeking Alpha Ucore Article

RE:Seeking Alpha Ucore ArticleI was reading this article and almost bought it (for a second).  The author is clearly bashing in a less obtuse way than the normal bashers we see on here but bashing nonetheless.  His arguments are terribly formed and don't make sense.  Half of them commit the same fallacies that he accuses Jim Mackenzie of doing.

Talks with IBC did NOT fall a part in April.  In fact, in April is when Ucore released the fantastic news about the separation of the rare earths over 99%.  IBC has members on the BoD for Ucore.  As far as anyone can see, the partnership is working great.

Also, it was plainly, comically, childish to call Jim out for saying that the majority of people believe SX (as it is today) is on its way out and that there needs to be a survey done to confirm this.  Give me a break.  Could you cite it in an academic journal - no; however, it's pretty obvious because otherwise NO ONE WOULD BE DEVELOPING NEW TECHNOLOGY (including the companies the author seems to like).

Cheers,
Imprint
Bullboard Posts