Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Intchains Group Ltd V.ICG


Primary Symbol: ICG

Intchains Group Ltd is a provider of integrated solutions consisting of computing application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip products for blockchain applications and a corporate holder of cryptocurrencies based on Ether (ETH). The Company utilizes a fabless business model and specializes in the front-end and back-end of Integrated circuit (IC) design, the two components of the IC product development chain. The Company’s products include computing ASIC chip products consisting of ASIC chips, computing equipment incorporating ASIC chips, ancillary software and hardware, the products are mainly used in the blockchain industry. The Company had built a technology platform named Xihe. The Company has developed hardware models and several systems under the Xihe Platform, including a factory production test system, an after-sales data system, a computing server system and a batch management system.


NDAQ:ICG - Post by User

Comment by blue0987on Jan 29, 2016 3:01pm
281 Views
Post# 24506726

RE:RE:Take out soon

RE:RE:Take out soon
To JV or be taken out, that is the question. Of which an answer seems to be on the horizon. 
 
Corporate Presentation taken off of Integra's web site, perhaps being updated with breaking news?
 
As I've mention in the past when Integra first brought in Eldorado back in August, my believe was negotiations at the time had already been underway with general terms of what an eventual end game (JV or TO) would involve.
 
Knowing Eldorado's stock would take a major hit after their latest news releases concerning their Greece operations, I would not be the least surprise that prior to those 2 news releases (Eldorado's stock is down 30% since), terms of a JV or Take-Out between Eldorado Gold, and Integra Gold was already near completion, or perhaps had already been agreed upon. If so, all that was needed before an announcement was to be made, was the viewing, and approval of those terms by the BOD.
 
Any competent management team in today's mining sector, acknowledges the immediate risks that lay out ahead of them, and are therefore able to take risk adverse action to counter them. What could be a better risk adverse action taken by the Eldorado's management team after the Greece setbacks (which was totally out of their hands, but knew they were coming), than announcing to the market a deal with Integra Gold, and all of its many attributes. 
 
Any good deal is a deal that works for both parties. We all understand what Integra Gold can offer Eldorado, what can Eldorado offer Integra?

I would be surprised if a complete take-out happens, if so then I'm looking at 2 different scenarios, 1) What our 10 analyst believe our company is worth collectively, .80 per/share. or 2) .60 per/share, cash upfront ($80M), with a 3%-5% NSR. New name of company - Integra Metals.
With either case shareholder approval is needed - 66.6%?
 
A JV of the Lamaque South, which is more likely, could see - Cash up-front for Lamaque North/Deep ($80M), development commitment up through commercial production ($70M), cash for future updated resource, up to $50 million. Total cash for Lamaque South JV - $200M.

Just my thoughts, perhaps too conservative, or perhaps overly optimistic, but that would be my parameters if I had to vote. GLTA
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>