RE:RE:RE:2016 plans moving forwardI know all that. I don't know what you think I am missing, I have explained what I think whai I know about the Pilot Plant. What decisions they make and do is all that matters.
As for your other comments on the mdj thread:
Look you know as for the past management you are rehashing old stuff that I have agreed to.
As for dreaming, we have expressed different points of views and I am not painting Doom and Gloom, but out of all the great things people keep insisting on it has not quite unfolded that way has it so that is where I am coming from.
Yes we all have interest in what transpires and wouldn’t be wasting my time if I wasn’t. You know that.
Again with the quips, I am not nave enough to think GSFC has had some role, unfortunately I do not have a copy of the Framework Agreement (FA) and not about to go to Calgary to get one. As for what more to research, it really boils to what Robin does now.
Again you rehash stuff we know does not make sense as to why Robin was fired etc. While some views were he could not get it done speak to the financing and inability to raise equity and why. But again old stuff that resolves nothing anymore.
No I do not think paying severance pays is the best use of funds etc. to say I do is idiotic. I am just as unhappy as many others. I have drawn my conclusions based on what I was told and my own view.
I know RICO is about corruption etc. and any relevant credibility. As for Braiche - we agree and why repeat myself.
As for Shareholders that are part of family are betting on GSFC. Now it still boils down to one point that you guys do not seem to acknowledge is Robin’s recommendation that if you look at the percentages will posibly make or break a deal with GSFC.
Again on the point about running the test through winter, you ignore the comment about Robin making the call etc. Yes the brine will flow in the spring. As to how much cost, why and time it basic administrative.
In large part, my comments about the management and argument was based on the dissatisfactions in on a lot of bad information by many in the know that was sheer nonsense. After that, I am one who tries to give people a fair chance given event looking for answers. Not that we are getting a lot know, but it makes more sense given what we know and needs little explanation.
As for public information, I have looked at a lot. If we disagree that is one thing. How much of it is useful is another. So I try to share and know that my views are not always popular.
Now that Robin is back we wait to know the outcome of the discussions. You have your narrative I have mine.
We have agreed on many points and try to be direct and avoid innuendos despite opinions to the contrary. If you do not want to provide specifics or avoid questions, fine. For the rest, let's not try not to make it something it isn’t.