Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

01 Communique Laboratory Inc V.ONE

Alternate Symbol(s):  OONEF

01 Communique Laboratory Inc. is a Canada-based technology company. The Company operates two business units. Its primary focus is cyber security business unit focusing on Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). PQC is designed to operate on classical computer systems, while at the same time secure enough to safeguard against cyber-attacks from quantum computers. IronCAP X is a quantum-safe end-to-end email encryption solution, which is designed for ultimate email privacy as well as ensuring senders' authenticity to eliminate phishing. The Company provides IronCAP cryptographic engine to businesses of all sizes, allowing them to easily transform their systems to withstand threats from Quantum Computers. The Company also provides vertical solutions that utilize its own IronCAP cryptographic engine to ensure quantum safety. Its remote access business unit provides its customers with a suite of secure remote access services and products under its I’m InTouch and I’m OnCall product offerings.


TSXV:ONE - Post by User

Comment by slagheapon Feb 18, 2016 5:43pm
129 Views
Post# 24572684

RE:RE:RE:Oral JMOL

RE:RE:RE:Oral JMOLI think it is relatively straight forward that an motion put forward by counsel and denied by the juidge must be included in the transcript or documentation otherwise the CAFC will refuse to hear it with good reason - you can`t re-argue the entire case before the CAFC.

An interesting document is # 513 filed on Jan.10/16 where Judge Lioi accepts the rulings of Judge Burke over objections of B&H. Did judge Lioi back up Judge Burke only because they work together? Are these rulings open to different interpretations or could there be a fundamental error in allowing these rulings to stand? A similar issue is whether the Citrix in-house e-mails which Judge Lioi moved to the damages phase should have been included in the infringement phase? That will be argued at the CAFC.
Bullboard Posts