RE:The vaughWhy am I not surprised by the conclusion you reach?
If this is so clear to you, can you explain your theory as to why the smart money is backing RR?
And it's "vague". And I'm trying to be as clear as possible, but I certainly won't speak for anyone else.
And this notion that RR hasn't complied with "disclosure requirements." You get that from your trusted HDI friends? If they have failed to comply, HDI will make short order of them. Right? If anything they have done is illegal, this will be over in a matter of minutes. Right? And if they've done something illegal, I ask you again, why are the large shareholders supporting them? Do you actually believe that the largest shareholders with tens of millions invested would support RR if they were acting illegally?